I'm going to type two newspaper articles from the Huntington Herald Press. They are full of errors and misspellings, but perhaps someone in the family hasn't seen these before. They relate to the death of Margaret Catherine Dunham Aldridge, wife of Harvey Homer Aldridge and daughter of Samuel and Eliza Matilda Reese Dunham.
Here's the first article, printed on May 8,1942:
"ILLNESS FATAL TO ANDREWS RESIDENT"
Margaret K. Aldrich dies at Home of Daughter
Mrs. Margaret Katherine Aldrich, 88, died at 5 p.m. Wednesday at the home of her daughter, Mrs. Cleo Beeks, in Andrews after a serious illness.
She was born in Tipton county May 18,1858 to Samuel and Matilda Dunham and was married April 1, 1880 to Harvey Aldrich at Kempton, where the family lived until 1910 when they came to Andrews. Mr. Aldrich died in August, 1930.
Surviving are two sons, Frank Aldrich, Wabash county, and Samuel Aldrich, Midland, Mich.; two daughters, Mrs. Della Harrell, Lagro, and Mrs. Beeks; 35 grandchildren and 25 great grandchildren. One son and three daughters are deceased.
The body was taken to the Zimmerman funeral home in Andrews where brief services will e held at 10 a.m. Saturday. The body will then be taken to Kempton where services will be held in the Methodist church at 2p.m. The Rev. John W. Borders, pastor of the Methodist church at Wabash will officiate. Burial will be in the Morris cemetery near Kempton."
The second is from the Andrews news column, which explains the delay, and is dated May 21, 1942.
"FUNERAL SERVICES
Short funeral services for Mrs. Margaret Aldridge were held at the Zimmerman funeral home and the body was taken to Kempton for final services and burials. Rev. John Borders of the Wabash Methodist Church officiated. Singers were Mrs. Lloyd Slagal and Lester Stephan accompanied at the pino by Elizabeth Warschko. Flowerbearers were granddaughters Anna Mae Beeks, Mary Margaret Beeks, Bernetta Huston, Lois Huston, Mary Enyard, Bernice Krider, Lurene Urschel, Doris Reynolds, Norma Jean Beeks, Carol Ann Enyeart and Lurene Kennedy. Pallbearers were grandsons James Beks, Paul Aldridge, Herbert Harrell, Herman Harrell, George Enyard and Roy Huston."
There is a lot of information in these paragraphs that may be new to some of the family. Remember that a couple of weeks ago I commented on the potential size of an Aldridge family reunion? These articles prompted that comment. There were many more great grandchildren born after Margaret's death, and those great grandchildren now have children, grand children, great grandchildren and perhaps even great great grandchildren of their own!
The line of descent is:
Margaret Catherine Dunham-Harvey Aldridge
Cleo Aldridge-Wilbur Beeks
Mary Margaret Beeks-Cleveland Harshbarger
Their descendants
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
Friday, May 26, 2017
Holbrook line: RIchard Seymour 1604-1655 Immigrant
First,the fanciful but probably not true, or at least not proven: Some believe that Richard Seymour was a descendant of the Seymours of Wolf Hall, recently a series on PBS television. Those Seymours were powerful people involved with even more powerful people, and they are fascinating. Our Richard may or may not be descended from them, but his own life is fascinating in its own way. Of course, I say that about all my ancestors!
Richard Seymour was baptized on January 27, 1604/05, the first child of Robert and Elizabeth Waller Seymour, at Sawbridgeworth, county Herts, England. This is right on the border with Essex county, and likely there were friends and relatives of the Seymours who lived just a few miles down the road but were from Essex and not Hertfordshire.
The next thing we know about Richard is that he married Mercy Ruscoe, daughter of Roger and Sarah Ruscoe of Sawbridgeworth, and the marriage occurred there on April 15,1631. Richard and Mercy had three children born at Sawbridgworth, from 1632 to 1636. Although I've not located immigration or transportation records, it seems likely that the Seymours (also spelled Seamer and Semer, among other variations) left England in 1638 and went to Hartford Connecticut, where many of the young town would have been old acquaintances from England. Many Hartford settlers had their origins in Essex County, and if these people had been worshipping together as Puritans, they would surely have known and loved their new/old neighbors.
Richard was not a first settler at Hartford, as his lot number was number 70, but he did receive a land allotment in 1639 so he and his family, which consisted of four sons (two daughters had apparently died in England), settled down in their new home, early in the town's history. His house was near the Ely home, and he also owned land toward West Hartford. He was elected chimney viewer in 1647, which was somewhat analogous to that of fire inspector today. The homes during this time period were built (except our pioneers used wood rather than the stone used in England) like those homes they'd left behind in England, meaning the roofs were thatched and prone to catching fire. It was Richard's job to make sure the families were taking safety precautions and to watch for fires that might start on the roof, especially around the chimney.
The land Richard had was "by the courtesy of the town", which meant in effect that he only had a life lease to the property, and could not pass it on to his sons. Possibly due to this fact, Richard joined a group of settlers who planned to settle a new area, Norwalk, also in what is now Connecticut. He signed an agreement for the settling and planting of Norwalk in 1650 and was settled there by 1652. Here his home was directly opposite the meeting house and Parade Ground, on the highway leading from Stamford to Fairfield. He is considered an original founder of Norwalk. He was elected townsman, or selectman, in 1655 but four months later wrote his will, when he was "very week and sike".
Richard Seymour's estate was inventoried October 10, 1655 and was valued at 255 pounds, 9 shillings, which is not bad for a man 50 years old. Most of the inventory is illegible but one can make out "books" valued at one pound. this would indicate probably several volumes, but maybe not more than 20. It would be intriguing to know what they were. Were they all religious books, or did he have some practical books also? His widow, Mercy, married Thomas Steele, one of the leaders of the Connecticut Colony. He died in 1665 and she outlived him, but records of her death have not been located.
So whether or not there is a connection to the Seymours of Wolf Hall, we certainly have a line to one of the early settlers of our country, and that is a good thing, too.
The line of descent is:
Richard Seymour-Mercy Ruscoe
Richard Seymour-Hannah Woodruff
Hannah Seymour-Joseph Pomeroy
Medad Pomeroy-Hannah Trumbull
Medad Pomeroy-Eunice Southwell
Eunice Pomeroy-Libbeus Stanard
Libbeus Stanard-Euzebia or Luceba Fay
Hiram Stanard-Susan Eddy
Louis Stanard-Mary Alice Hetrick
Etta Stanard-Loren Holbrook
Gladys Holbrook-Richard Allen
Their descendants
Richard Seymour was baptized on January 27, 1604/05, the first child of Robert and Elizabeth Waller Seymour, at Sawbridgeworth, county Herts, England. This is right on the border with Essex county, and likely there were friends and relatives of the Seymours who lived just a few miles down the road but were from Essex and not Hertfordshire.
The next thing we know about Richard is that he married Mercy Ruscoe, daughter of Roger and Sarah Ruscoe of Sawbridgeworth, and the marriage occurred there on April 15,1631. Richard and Mercy had three children born at Sawbridgworth, from 1632 to 1636. Although I've not located immigration or transportation records, it seems likely that the Seymours (also spelled Seamer and Semer, among other variations) left England in 1638 and went to Hartford Connecticut, where many of the young town would have been old acquaintances from England. Many Hartford settlers had their origins in Essex County, and if these people had been worshipping together as Puritans, they would surely have known and loved their new/old neighbors.
Richard was not a first settler at Hartford, as his lot number was number 70, but he did receive a land allotment in 1639 so he and his family, which consisted of four sons (two daughters had apparently died in England), settled down in their new home, early in the town's history. His house was near the Ely home, and he also owned land toward West Hartford. He was elected chimney viewer in 1647, which was somewhat analogous to that of fire inspector today. The homes during this time period were built (except our pioneers used wood rather than the stone used in England) like those homes they'd left behind in England, meaning the roofs were thatched and prone to catching fire. It was Richard's job to make sure the families were taking safety precautions and to watch for fires that might start on the roof, especially around the chimney.
The land Richard had was "by the courtesy of the town", which meant in effect that he only had a life lease to the property, and could not pass it on to his sons. Possibly due to this fact, Richard joined a group of settlers who planned to settle a new area, Norwalk, also in what is now Connecticut. He signed an agreement for the settling and planting of Norwalk in 1650 and was settled there by 1652. Here his home was directly opposite the meeting house and Parade Ground, on the highway leading from Stamford to Fairfield. He is considered an original founder of Norwalk. He was elected townsman, or selectman, in 1655 but four months later wrote his will, when he was "very week and sike".
Richard Seymour's estate was inventoried October 10, 1655 and was valued at 255 pounds, 9 shillings, which is not bad for a man 50 years old. Most of the inventory is illegible but one can make out "books" valued at one pound. this would indicate probably several volumes, but maybe not more than 20. It would be intriguing to know what they were. Were they all religious books, or did he have some practical books also? His widow, Mercy, married Thomas Steele, one of the leaders of the Connecticut Colony. He died in 1665 and she outlived him, but records of her death have not been located.
So whether or not there is a connection to the Seymours of Wolf Hall, we certainly have a line to one of the early settlers of our country, and that is a good thing, too.
The line of descent is:
Richard Seymour-Mercy Ruscoe
Richard Seymour-Hannah Woodruff
Hannah Seymour-Joseph Pomeroy
Medad Pomeroy-Hannah Trumbull
Medad Pomeroy-Eunice Southwell
Eunice Pomeroy-Libbeus Stanard
Libbeus Stanard-Euzebia or Luceba Fay
Hiram Stanard-Susan Eddy
Louis Stanard-Mary Alice Hetrick
Etta Stanard-Loren Holbrook
Gladys Holbrook-Richard Allen
Their descendants
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Allen line: Richard Smith 1595-166, Immigrant
I'd like to be more confident in what I'm writing about Richard Smith. As you can see, it's a common name and even in a small town the size of Wethersfield, Connecticut there may have been as many as three Richard Smiths there during the lifetime of our ancestor. Mostly I'll be writing about the more likely and unlikely possibilities, instead of being more definite about the facts that I usually find.
Richard Smith was probably born about 1595. He may have been the son of John Smith and Alice Walker, but others have disputed this and I certainly don't have anything more to add to the story. He did marry Rebecca Buswell, daughter of Roger and Margaret Buswell on February 13, 1615 in Husbands Bosworth, Leicester, England. It is a small village now and may have been even smaller when the couple were married. The church dates from the 1500's so one could presumably visit there if desired, and see the actual location.
It's been suggested that Richard came to Connecticut as early as 1635, but that is based on the idea that he was the son of John and Alice mentioned above. It seems to me to be just speculation until his parentage is firmly established. At aany rate, it appears that all of their six known children were born in Husbands Bosworth, with Abigail being born in 1638, So sometime after that time, the family arrived at Wethersfield, which is on the Connecticut River, and is now just south of Hartford. (At the time, probably several miles separated the two towns, with travel back and forth being done by ship).
Wethersfield was the scene of three witch trials while the Smiths lived there, which indicates that the town had problems and also that the town in general was a Puritan town. We know that Richard was on jury duty in 1650, when he was at least 55 years old and some have guessed he was actually 72 or 73 at this time. He was involved in some sort of law suit in 1652, and there are records for land he sold or gave to family members. He died about 1669,still in Wethersfield.
That is as much as is known about Richard Smith, husband of Rebecca Buswell. We can hope that he had a trade, or skill as a farmer, or something that supported the family, but we don't know what that was. There apparently was no will, as he gave his assets to family members, particularly all his remaining real estate to his youngest son Jonathan Rebecca is thought to have preceded him in death by about two years.
As is so often true, there's much more work to be done to identify Richard Smith and to tell his story. We don't know when he came to America, or why, or what he did after he arrived here. We don't know the extent of his religious commitment, or even whether or not he could read.
Oh, one cool note...We do know that both Richard and his wife were treated by John Winthrop, Jr, the governor of Connecticut. His brief Wikipedia article doesn't describe any medical degree or training, so that leaves me a little confused. I'll keep looking for an explanation for that!
The line of descent is:
Richard Smith-Rebecca Buswell
Susanna Smith-Simon Hoyt
Benjamin Hoyt-Hannah Weed
Hannah Hoyt-Daniel Scofield
Hannah Scofield-Nathaniel Finch
Jesse Finch-Hannah
Hannah Finch-John Bell
Hannah Bell-Thomas Knott
John W Knott-Harriet Starr
Edith Knott-Edward Allen
Richard Allen-Gladys Holbrook
Their descendants
Richard Smith was probably born about 1595. He may have been the son of John Smith and Alice Walker, but others have disputed this and I certainly don't have anything more to add to the story. He did marry Rebecca Buswell, daughter of Roger and Margaret Buswell on February 13, 1615 in Husbands Bosworth, Leicester, England. It is a small village now and may have been even smaller when the couple were married. The church dates from the 1500's so one could presumably visit there if desired, and see the actual location.
It's been suggested that Richard came to Connecticut as early as 1635, but that is based on the idea that he was the son of John and Alice mentioned above. It seems to me to be just speculation until his parentage is firmly established. At aany rate, it appears that all of their six known children were born in Husbands Bosworth, with Abigail being born in 1638, So sometime after that time, the family arrived at Wethersfield, which is on the Connecticut River, and is now just south of Hartford. (At the time, probably several miles separated the two towns, with travel back and forth being done by ship).
Wethersfield was the scene of three witch trials while the Smiths lived there, which indicates that the town had problems and also that the town in general was a Puritan town. We know that Richard was on jury duty in 1650, when he was at least 55 years old and some have guessed he was actually 72 or 73 at this time. He was involved in some sort of law suit in 1652, and there are records for land he sold or gave to family members. He died about 1669,still in Wethersfield.
That is as much as is known about Richard Smith, husband of Rebecca Buswell. We can hope that he had a trade, or skill as a farmer, or something that supported the family, but we don't know what that was. There apparently was no will, as he gave his assets to family members, particularly all his remaining real estate to his youngest son Jonathan Rebecca is thought to have preceded him in death by about two years.
As is so often true, there's much more work to be done to identify Richard Smith and to tell his story. We don't know when he came to America, or why, or what he did after he arrived here. We don't know the extent of his religious commitment, or even whether or not he could read.
Oh, one cool note...We do know that both Richard and his wife were treated by John Winthrop, Jr, the governor of Connecticut. His brief Wikipedia article doesn't describe any medical degree or training, so that leaves me a little confused. I'll keep looking for an explanation for that!
The line of descent is:
Richard Smith-Rebecca Buswell
Susanna Smith-Simon Hoyt
Benjamin Hoyt-Hannah Weed
Hannah Hoyt-Daniel Scofield
Hannah Scofield-Nathaniel Finch
Jesse Finch-Hannah
Hannah Finch-John Bell
Hannah Bell-Thomas Knott
John W Knott-Harriet Starr
Edith Knott-Edward Allen
Richard Allen-Gladys Holbrook
Their descendants
Friday, May 19, 2017
Harshbarger line: No more ancestor stories, for now
At the moment, I am out of names in the Harshbarger line to write about. Either I've written about them back to their home in Germany or Switzerland (mostly) or I'm not able to find them any further back than whatever their birth or marriage date is, here in the states. Unfortunately there are quite a few of those names, such as Mary Gearhart, Joseph Withers, Joseph Kirk, Tobias Miller, Peter Ulrich Schnerr, Jacob Kestenholtz, and others. There is more to be found about these people, I'm sure, but I'm also sure that at this point I don't have the knowledge to do it. So for now, this might be the end of the Harshbarger posts-until my next discovery.
I have had some thoughts about the more recent Harshbarger lines. In contrast to the Beeks family, who is somewhat well documented in local newspaper accounts, I have found nothing at all about the Grover Harshbarger family in the 15 years (1927-almost all of of 1942) of newspapers I've read for the Huntington Herald Press. Obviously one explanation is that the Harshbarger family was small and the Beeks family was large. But other factors may play in to the difference also. Grover was a hard working man and Goldie, as far as is known, stayed at home to raise her son. They didn't get into legal trouble. They weren't leaders in any church or other organization. They had no musical talents that meant they would be called on to sing at funerals. They didn't have auto accidents (I'm not sure when they actually got their first car, but it would have been before they moved to the Majenica area, surely). I haven't found their name in any of the "removal" columns either, so I'm not sure exactly when the move was.
The point I'm making is that many ancestors were like the Grover Harshbarger family. They weren't highly educated, or maybe not educated at all, and the friends they had were also low profile people. They likely engaged in some of the same activities that more publicized families did, such as get togethers with neighbors, basket dinners, helping each other out. Perhaps they voted, perhaps they didn't, but they likely had political opinions that were not noted in letters to the editor. Lots of good people are hard to trace even 75 to 80 years ago. No wonder they are hard to trace back in the 1700s!
I'm not sure how I'm going to handle the loss of the Harshbarger family lines, as far as blog posts go. Maybe I'll make a discovery in the next two weeks that will allow me to postpone having to make that decision. I've truly enjoyed learning more about this family, starting from the information I had in my wedding book (great grandparents) and working both backwards and sideways, to learn the stories of the ancestors I've found. When I started, all I "knew" of the origins was that the Harshbargers were "Pennsylvania Dutch." They are so much more!
I have had some thoughts about the more recent Harshbarger lines. In contrast to the Beeks family, who is somewhat well documented in local newspaper accounts, I have found nothing at all about the Grover Harshbarger family in the 15 years (1927-almost all of of 1942) of newspapers I've read for the Huntington Herald Press. Obviously one explanation is that the Harshbarger family was small and the Beeks family was large. But other factors may play in to the difference also. Grover was a hard working man and Goldie, as far as is known, stayed at home to raise her son. They didn't get into legal trouble. They weren't leaders in any church or other organization. They had no musical talents that meant they would be called on to sing at funerals. They didn't have auto accidents (I'm not sure when they actually got their first car, but it would have been before they moved to the Majenica area, surely). I haven't found their name in any of the "removal" columns either, so I'm not sure exactly when the move was.
The point I'm making is that many ancestors were like the Grover Harshbarger family. They weren't highly educated, or maybe not educated at all, and the friends they had were also low profile people. They likely engaged in some of the same activities that more publicized families did, such as get togethers with neighbors, basket dinners, helping each other out. Perhaps they voted, perhaps they didn't, but they likely had political opinions that were not noted in letters to the editor. Lots of good people are hard to trace even 75 to 80 years ago. No wonder they are hard to trace back in the 1700s!
I'm not sure how I'm going to handle the loss of the Harshbarger family lines, as far as blog posts go. Maybe I'll make a discovery in the next two weeks that will allow me to postpone having to make that decision. I've truly enjoyed learning more about this family, starting from the information I had in my wedding book (great grandparents) and working both backwards and sideways, to learn the stories of the ancestors I've found. When I started, all I "knew" of the origins was that the Harshbargers were "Pennsylvania Dutch." They are so much more!
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
Beeks lines: "Bits and Pieces from my Andrews research"
Most of my very few readers know that I am currently reading newspapers for a possible second book about Andrews history. I am fortunate in that while I am reading Huntington, Indiana newspapers I occasionally come across some articles that "fill in the blanks", or at least a few of them, about the Beeks family. Maybe everyone(!) who reads this post will already know this information, but it was all news to me.
First, a little on the light hearted side, Wilbur Beeks seemed to get called for jury duty with great regularity. I don't know what happened, but in May of 1941, when he was again called for grand jury duty, he apparently asked to be excused. I don't know whether this was the first time, or what the reason was, but here's what the Huntington Herald Press said on May 18,1941:
"TWO GRAND JURORS EXCUSED BY JUDGE
Remaining Xis Expected to meet Thursday, 9 A.M.
William E Norris, Jackson township farmer and Wilbur Beeks, of Andrews, members of the Huntington county grand jury, have been excused from serving in the session set to begin Thursday, 9 a.m. (cdwt) according to entries made on the court record by Judge Otto H. Krieg.
The entries set out that the men presented "good and sufficient reason" and accordingly were excused.
The riding bailiff has summoned Ora Baker, Jefferson township, to take Beeks place.
Beeks, seventh man drawn for the April term grand jury, was summoned when Norris was excused. When Beeks was excused the eighth and last man was summoned..." So, what was the good and sufficient reason, I wonder?
Now, to information that was to me both interesting and sad, besides being new to me. The first was an article from the same Newspaper of November 7,1941 headed "John Wise Dies at Home of Nephew in Andrews." Briefly, it told the story of John Wise who had died at the home of Wilbur Beeks, with whom he had lived for some time. I've never heard of this man, other than that he was the son of David and Matilda Martin Wise, so I had to go out looking for information. He was not to be found in the 1900 census, at least not that I recognized, but in 1910, 1920, and 1930 he was listed as a farm worker. In 1910 and 1920 he apparently worked on the farm of two sisters (not his) in Lagro Township, wabash County, and in 1930 he was a laborer already living with Wilbur (and Cleo) Beeks. Perhaps the two women he worked for had died, as they were considerably older than he was. He lived with the Beeks family for at least 10 years and possibly longer, until his death at age 69. The only other named relatives were his nephew Chester Beeks of Chicago, and his niece Mrs. Charity Carpenter, also of Chicago. I learned from the census that he had a seventh grade education and could read and write.
There are those living who could tell more of John's story. I'd like to know more about him. For instance, I didn't find him in a WW I draft registration index. Was he simply too old to be drafted? What about the Spanish American War? I have no reason to think he served in the military, but it's possible. Did he have some physical handicap that kept him from living a more expansive life, or was he simply a happy go lucky man who didn't have a lot of ambition? And what was he like? There will soon be no one left to remember him, and I'd like to know his story.
Finally, there was another obituary, which had some surprising information. Printed in the November 29, 1940 Huntington Herald Press there was an obituary for Mrs. Dorothy O. Huston. She was the daughter of Harvey and Margaret Aldridge, and the sister of Cleo Beeks, among others. She died at the age of 46 after having been in failing health for several sears, and being bedfast for two years.
Survivors included her husband, Frank, four daughters, four sons, four grandchildren, two brothers and two sisters. Three sons preceded her in death. What surprised me was the number of children, and also the fact that I think I knew some of them. Mrs. Doris Reynold of Lagro and Roy Huston were the two who appear to have established their own households. Vivian, Bernetta, Lois, Alven, Marvin and Walter all lived at home. Brother Frank Aldridge lived in Wabash and Samuel Aldridge in Midland, Michigan. Sisters were Mrs. Cleo Beeks of Andrews and Mrs. Stella (should be Della) Harrell of Lancaster township.
I'm coming to the conclusion that there are a lot more cousins out there than I knew about. I know a Beeks reunion would be very large, but an Aldridge reunion would be awesome!! And all this news was because I read some newspapers.
First, a little on the light hearted side, Wilbur Beeks seemed to get called for jury duty with great regularity. I don't know what happened, but in May of 1941, when he was again called for grand jury duty, he apparently asked to be excused. I don't know whether this was the first time, or what the reason was, but here's what the Huntington Herald Press said on May 18,1941:
"TWO GRAND JURORS EXCUSED BY JUDGE
Remaining Xis Expected to meet Thursday, 9 A.M.
William E Norris, Jackson township farmer and Wilbur Beeks, of Andrews, members of the Huntington county grand jury, have been excused from serving in the session set to begin Thursday, 9 a.m. (cdwt) according to entries made on the court record by Judge Otto H. Krieg.
The entries set out that the men presented "good and sufficient reason" and accordingly were excused.
The riding bailiff has summoned Ora Baker, Jefferson township, to take Beeks place.
Beeks, seventh man drawn for the April term grand jury, was summoned when Norris was excused. When Beeks was excused the eighth and last man was summoned..." So, what was the good and sufficient reason, I wonder?
Now, to information that was to me both interesting and sad, besides being new to me. The first was an article from the same Newspaper of November 7,1941 headed "John Wise Dies at Home of Nephew in Andrews." Briefly, it told the story of John Wise who had died at the home of Wilbur Beeks, with whom he had lived for some time. I've never heard of this man, other than that he was the son of David and Matilda Martin Wise, so I had to go out looking for information. He was not to be found in the 1900 census, at least not that I recognized, but in 1910, 1920, and 1930 he was listed as a farm worker. In 1910 and 1920 he apparently worked on the farm of two sisters (not his) in Lagro Township, wabash County, and in 1930 he was a laborer already living with Wilbur (and Cleo) Beeks. Perhaps the two women he worked for had died, as they were considerably older than he was. He lived with the Beeks family for at least 10 years and possibly longer, until his death at age 69. The only other named relatives were his nephew Chester Beeks of Chicago, and his niece Mrs. Charity Carpenter, also of Chicago. I learned from the census that he had a seventh grade education and could read and write.
There are those living who could tell more of John's story. I'd like to know more about him. For instance, I didn't find him in a WW I draft registration index. Was he simply too old to be drafted? What about the Spanish American War? I have no reason to think he served in the military, but it's possible. Did he have some physical handicap that kept him from living a more expansive life, or was he simply a happy go lucky man who didn't have a lot of ambition? And what was he like? There will soon be no one left to remember him, and I'd like to know his story.
Finally, there was another obituary, which had some surprising information. Printed in the November 29, 1940 Huntington Herald Press there was an obituary for Mrs. Dorothy O. Huston. She was the daughter of Harvey and Margaret Aldridge, and the sister of Cleo Beeks, among others. She died at the age of 46 after having been in failing health for several sears, and being bedfast for two years.
Survivors included her husband, Frank, four daughters, four sons, four grandchildren, two brothers and two sisters. Three sons preceded her in death. What surprised me was the number of children, and also the fact that I think I knew some of them. Mrs. Doris Reynold of Lagro and Roy Huston were the two who appear to have established their own households. Vivian, Bernetta, Lois, Alven, Marvin and Walter all lived at home. Brother Frank Aldridge lived in Wabash and Samuel Aldridge in Midland, Michigan. Sisters were Mrs. Cleo Beeks of Andrews and Mrs. Stella (should be Della) Harrell of Lancaster township.
I'm coming to the conclusion that there are a lot more cousins out there than I knew about. I know a Beeks reunion would be very large, but an Aldridge reunion would be awesome!! And all this news was because I read some newspapers.
Friday, May 12, 2017
Holbrook line: Walter Haynes 1583-1665, Immigrant
How do I condense the life of this immigrant ancestor into a few paragraphs and still tell a little of his story? We are fortunate to know so much about Walter Haynes, as he was a linen-weaver by occupation. We would probably have been considered a tradesman, rather than a farmer but most likely raised at least some crops for his family. Not everyone is so fortunate as to have this much information about a tradesman ancestor, so I'm not complaining.
Walter Haynes was born in 1583 in Sutton, Mandeville, Wiltshire, England. It's a small village not far from the south central coast of England, There is a 13th century church there, with the tower built in the 15th century. Walter's parents, probably John and Alice Lambert Haynes, would have been very familiar with this church and likely Walter was, too. We don't know when or if Walter became a Puritan because despite considerable information about him, I don't find mention of a church allegiance.
He and his wife Elizabeth left England on April 24, 1638 on board the "Confidence" and arrived in New England in June of that year. Boston and the surrounding small towns would have been new then, and anxious for skilled men such as linen-weavers to arrive and help build the colony. When Walter arrived, it was with five of their six children, and three servants. Walter was already 55 years old so it was likely that servants were necessary to do some of the hard work of building a home and a town.
Walter first lived in Watertown, probably while the plans were being completed for the founding of the town known as Sudbury. He was granted land there in December of 1639, and the first houses or lean tos were constructed then. Let's hope that he had a house constructed! The first church was organized in 1640, and it seems likely that Walter was a member if only because he was made a freeman in 1641 and was frequently a selectman, and also a representative to the General Court. . We are also told that Walter Haynes's first house was made into a garrison during King Philip's War (1675-1677), after Walter and his wife had both died. This indicates that the house he constructed, or had constructed, was substantial.
Elizabeth tied in 1659 and Walter wrote his will at about that same time. He lived for six more years, dying February 14, 1665. At his death, he left property in England to the daughter who had stayed in England, and his inventory amounted to 495.18.10, which would not seem insubstantial for a linen weaver. I'm proud to call him an ancestor.
The line of descent is:
Walter Haynes-Elizabeth
Suffrance Haynes-Nathaniel Treadway
Elizabeth Treadway-Joseph Hayward
Lydia Hayward-John Hanchett
Hannah Hanchett-John Stannard
Libbeus Stannard-Eunice Pomeroy
Libbeus Stannard-Luceba Fay
Hiram Stanard-Susan Eddy
Louis E Stanard-Mary Alice Hetrick
Etta Stanard-Loren Holbrook
Gladys Holbrook-Richard Allen
Their descendants
Walter Haynes was born in 1583 in Sutton, Mandeville, Wiltshire, England. It's a small village not far from the south central coast of England, There is a 13th century church there, with the tower built in the 15th century. Walter's parents, probably John and Alice Lambert Haynes, would have been very familiar with this church and likely Walter was, too. We don't know when or if Walter became a Puritan because despite considerable information about him, I don't find mention of a church allegiance.
He and his wife Elizabeth left England on April 24, 1638 on board the "Confidence" and arrived in New England in June of that year. Boston and the surrounding small towns would have been new then, and anxious for skilled men such as linen-weavers to arrive and help build the colony. When Walter arrived, it was with five of their six children, and three servants. Walter was already 55 years old so it was likely that servants were necessary to do some of the hard work of building a home and a town.
Walter first lived in Watertown, probably while the plans were being completed for the founding of the town known as Sudbury. He was granted land there in December of 1639, and the first houses or lean tos were constructed then. Let's hope that he had a house constructed! The first church was organized in 1640, and it seems likely that Walter was a member if only because he was made a freeman in 1641 and was frequently a selectman, and also a representative to the General Court. . We are also told that Walter Haynes's first house was made into a garrison during King Philip's War (1675-1677), after Walter and his wife had both died. This indicates that the house he constructed, or had constructed, was substantial.
Elizabeth tied in 1659 and Walter wrote his will at about that same time. He lived for six more years, dying February 14, 1665. At his death, he left property in England to the daughter who had stayed in England, and his inventory amounted to 495.18.10, which would not seem insubstantial for a linen weaver. I'm proud to call him an ancestor.
The line of descent is:
Walter Haynes-Elizabeth
Suffrance Haynes-Nathaniel Treadway
Elizabeth Treadway-Joseph Hayward
Lydia Hayward-John Hanchett
Hannah Hanchett-John Stannard
Libbeus Stannard-Eunice Pomeroy
Libbeus Stannard-Luceba Fay
Hiram Stanard-Susan Eddy
Louis E Stanard-Mary Alice Hetrick
Etta Stanard-Loren Holbrook
Gladys Holbrook-Richard Allen
Their descendants
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Allen line; Robert Johnson died 1661, Immigrant
There are a lot of stories about Robert Johnson on line, but not a lot of good, documented information. I'm not sure but I think it's possible that two Robert Johnson's have been combined and confused, and that makes it hard to determine which Robert Johnson is ours.
The esteemed genealogist Donald Lines Jacobus in his "Families of Ancient New Haven" gives the idea that three brothers came from Hull, Yorkshire, England, and from that others have apparently jumped at the conclusion that Robert is the son of Abraham who was the son of Robert Johnson son of Maurice Johnson, who was an alderman of Stanford in Lincolnshire. I'm not sure this holds up under scrutiny, but it's possible.
I'll start with what I believe to be correct. Robert Johnson was in New Haven, Connecticut as early as 1641. At least two more generations of Johnsons lived in New Haven, and their records seem to be a little more easily traced. So that's helpful, to show that Robert was an early resident there
William Richard Cutter says that Robert came to Boston in 1637 from Kingston on Hull, Yorkshire, England, where he was in business. He brought his wife "Adlin" and four sons, Robert, Thomas, John, and William. There is some belief that Aldin may have been a second wife, but so far no records have been produced to indicate whether this is so or not.
The first I can really find about Robert is that he was in New Haven, Connecticut in 1641, and that this is where he spent the remainder of his days. He is believed to have been born sometime between 1603 and 1612, but again, there is no known documentation. It makes sense based on the ages of his known children to think that it would be closer to 1603, since some of his children are believed to have been born in the early to mid 1620's.
We see him in 1641 in New Haven in a dispute with his brother, John. He had loaned money to John back in England, and John apparently did not pay him back. the house had been pledged as security, or so Robert thought. In the 1640's he was several times appointed to committees to resolve disputes about crops damaged by cattle and hogs, and to determine how much corn each farmer was growing, that the town would be responsible to buy. He bought 91/2 acres of land "in the Necke" and also had recorded 62 acres of "upland" he had purchased from Thomas Yale, both in 1646. He apparently also owned a dwelling or land in "Yorkshire quarter", which was disposed of in his will.
That is pretty much what is known of Robert Johnson. If he was descended from Maurice Johnson then there is likely more material to be found regarding his ancestry, and hopefully more clues to his occupation, religion, and other mundane matters that bring our ancestors to life.
For now, we will leave him at the end of his life, in 1661, in New Haven. He chose to live there and had been there at least 20 years, watching his family grow and settle in to the new land they had come to. I am thankful that men like Robert Johnson were willing to come to America and build this new land!
The line of descent is:
Robert Johnson-Adeline
John Johnson-Hannah Parmalee
Samuel Johnson-unknown
Mary Johnson-Matthew Bellamy
Hannah Bellamy-John Royse
Elizabeth Royse-William McCoy
James McCoy-Nancy Ann Lane
Vincent McCoy-Eleanor Jackson
Nancy McCoy-George Allen
Edward Allen-Edith Knott
Richard Allen-Gladys Holbrook
Their descendants
The esteemed genealogist Donald Lines Jacobus in his "Families of Ancient New Haven" gives the idea that three brothers came from Hull, Yorkshire, England, and from that others have apparently jumped at the conclusion that Robert is the son of Abraham who was the son of Robert Johnson son of Maurice Johnson, who was an alderman of Stanford in Lincolnshire. I'm not sure this holds up under scrutiny, but it's possible.
I'll start with what I believe to be correct. Robert Johnson was in New Haven, Connecticut as early as 1641. At least two more generations of Johnsons lived in New Haven, and their records seem to be a little more easily traced. So that's helpful, to show that Robert was an early resident there
William Richard Cutter says that Robert came to Boston in 1637 from Kingston on Hull, Yorkshire, England, where he was in business. He brought his wife "Adlin" and four sons, Robert, Thomas, John, and William. There is some belief that Aldin may have been a second wife, but so far no records have been produced to indicate whether this is so or not.
The first I can really find about Robert is that he was in New Haven, Connecticut in 1641, and that this is where he spent the remainder of his days. He is believed to have been born sometime between 1603 and 1612, but again, there is no known documentation. It makes sense based on the ages of his known children to think that it would be closer to 1603, since some of his children are believed to have been born in the early to mid 1620's.
We see him in 1641 in New Haven in a dispute with his brother, John. He had loaned money to John back in England, and John apparently did not pay him back. the house had been pledged as security, or so Robert thought. In the 1640's he was several times appointed to committees to resolve disputes about crops damaged by cattle and hogs, and to determine how much corn each farmer was growing, that the town would be responsible to buy. He bought 91/2 acres of land "in the Necke" and also had recorded 62 acres of "upland" he had purchased from Thomas Yale, both in 1646. He apparently also owned a dwelling or land in "Yorkshire quarter", which was disposed of in his will.
That is pretty much what is known of Robert Johnson. If he was descended from Maurice Johnson then there is likely more material to be found regarding his ancestry, and hopefully more clues to his occupation, religion, and other mundane matters that bring our ancestors to life.
For now, we will leave him at the end of his life, in 1661, in New Haven. He chose to live there and had been there at least 20 years, watching his family grow and settle in to the new land they had come to. I am thankful that men like Robert Johnson were willing to come to America and build this new land!
The line of descent is:
Robert Johnson-Adeline
John Johnson-Hannah Parmalee
Samuel Johnson-unknown
Mary Johnson-Matthew Bellamy
Hannah Bellamy-John Royse
Elizabeth Royse-William McCoy
James McCoy-Nancy Ann Lane
Vincent McCoy-Eleanor Jackson
Nancy McCoy-George Allen
Edward Allen-Edith Knott
Richard Allen-Gladys Holbrook
Their descendants
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)